Laura Wright 
In 1828, newspapers began reporting an extraordinary discovery near Sparta, Tennessee.
Several ancient burial grounds had reportedly been uncovered in White County. Inside were stone-lined graves containing human skeletons.
But according to the accounts, these were no ordinary skeletons.
The largest measured only nineteen inches long.
Even stranger, some were said to possess teeth worn smooth with age. To the people examining them, these did not appear to be the remains of infants.
They appeared to be adults.
Had someone uncovered the burial grounds of a forgotten race of little people?
The story would survive for generations.
The Graves Near Sparta
One of the most important early accounts appeared in the Cherokee Phoenix on August 20, 1828.
The newspaper reported the discovery of three burial grounds near Sparta containing what it described as a “very small people.” According to the report, numerous graves had been opened and examined.
The graves themselves were unusual.
They were approximately two feet deep and constructed like small stone coffins, with flat stones forming the bottom, sides, ends and covering.
The bodies were reportedly arranged carefully on their backs with their hands across their breasts.
All had their heads pointing east.
Objects accompanied some of the dead. Small vessels were found near the left arms of the skeletons, sometimes containing shells. One skeleton reportedly wore dozens of pearl beads around its neck. Later versions of the account described burial grounds covering as much as an acre and a half.
This was clearly more than the accidental burial of a few individuals.
Someone had created these cemeteries deliberately.
The question was who.
Adults Only Nineteen Inches Tall?
The most sensational claim concerned the bones themselves.
According to the 1828 report, none of the skeletons exceeded nineteen inches in length. Yet observers supposedly believed that at least some had reached old age because their teeth appeared worn smooth and short.
That distinction was crucial.
Small skeletons alone presented no mystery. They could simply have belonged to infants and children.
But small skeletons belonging to elderly adults suggested something extraordinary.
The story spread.
By the middle of the nineteenth century, accounts of Tennessee’s tiny ancient inhabitants were being reprinted far beyond White County. An 1851 newspaper account repeated essentially the same description, including the tiny skeletons, worn teeth, stone graves and accompanying objects.
Eventually, Tennessee’s supposed ancient pygmies became part of America’s growing collection of archaeological mysteries.
There Was a Problem
Not everyone who actually examined the graves believed the extraordinary interpretation.
English geologist George William Featherstonhaugh visited the area in 1834. Turner Lane, whose property had become associated with the discoveries, reportedly told him that he did not accept the pygmy theory and believed the small graves belonged to children of various ages.
Later scientific examination produced the same conclusion.
Dr. Joseph Jones, who studied ancient remains from Tennessee during the nineteenth century, stated that the bones he examined from the small graves were those of infants and children.
That provides a much more ordinary explanation for the nineteen-inch skeletons.
But it doesn’t make the story uninteresting.
Quite the opposite.
The Stone Box Graves
The graves themselves were real.
Stone-box burials are an important archaeological feature of Middle Tennessee. The dead were placed within graves lined and covered with slabs of stone, creating something resembling a small coffin or box.
The small size of some graves helped fuel nineteenth-century speculation about a diminutive ancient population.
But there is an obvious problem with estimating someone’s height from the dimensions of a grave.
The body does not necessarily have to be buried fully extended.
And a grave containing a child tells us nothing about the average stature of the population to which that child belonged.
In an era when archaeology was still developing as a scientific discipline, discoveries were often interpreted quickly and dramatically.
A small grave could become evidence of a small race.
A large skeleton could become evidence of giants.
And newspapers were no less fond of an astonishing headline in 1828 than they are today.
But What About the Worn Teeth?
This is perhaps the most intriguing detail in the original report.
Observers claimed that some of the tiny skeletons possessed teeth that appeared worn, which they interpreted as evidence that the individuals had lived to advanced ages.
If that observation were correct, the child explanation would become considerably more difficult.
But we no longer possess the original context necessary to evaluate the claim properly.
Were the teeth actually heavily worn?
Were they correctly associated with the tiny skeletons?
Were nineteenth-century observers accurately estimating age?
Did later retellings exaggerate what had originally been seen?
Those questions cannot easily be answered from a newspaper account nearly two centuries old.
What we do know is that trained investigators who subsequently examined remains from the small Tennessee graves rejected the idea that they represented a miniature race.
An Ancient Community
Another tantalizing detail appears in later versions of the early account.
Near one cemetery, observers reportedly saw what they interpreted as the remains or traces of an ancient town.
The burial grounds therefore belonged to a larger archaeological landscape.
People had lived here.
They buried their dead carefully in stone-lined graves. They placed objects with them. Shells and ornaments survived alongside some of the remains.
Those facts are more historically important than the pygmy legend that eventually overshadowed them.
The people responsible were not mysterious creatures.
They belonged to the Indigenous history of Tennessee, although nineteenth-century settlers frequently failed to recognize Native American archaeological sites for what they were.
How a Discovery Became a Legend
The evolution of the story is almost as fascinating as the graves themselves.
People encountered unusually small stone graves.
Some early observers concluded that the skeletons belonged to tiny adults.
Newspapers reported a race of miniature people.
The reports were copied.
The story traveled.
Decades later, even after investigators had concluded that the remains belonged to children, the Tennessee pygmies refused to disappear.
And perhaps that isn’t surprising.
“Ancient children’s cemetery discovered near Sparta” is archaeologically interesting.
“Lost race of nineteen-inch people discovered beneath Tennessee farmland” is considerably harder to forget.
The Mystery That Remains
There probably was no forgotten race of nineteen-inch people living near Sparta.
The later examinations of the remains provide strong evidence against it.
But dismissing the entire story as a hoax would be equally misleading.
The graves existed.
People really opened them.
The unusual stone burials were described in contemporary accounts.
Artifacts were reportedly recovered.
And in 1828, witnesses really did claim that they had examined remarkably small skeletons displaying characteristics they interpreted as those of adults.
The mystery therefore isn’t necessarily Who were the tiny people?
A better question may be:
How did real ancient burial grounds become evidence for a race that probably never existed?
Nearly two hundred years later, the answer lies somewhere between archaeology, misunderstanding, newspaper sensationalism and folklore.
The little people may have vanished.
Their legend did not.
About the Author
