Laura Wright 
For centuries, people believed the dead could identify their own murderers.
The practice was known as the Ordeal of Touch, or the Bier’s Test, and its premise was remarkably simple.
The body of a murder victim was placed upon a small platform, or bier. Suspects were then brought before the corpse and commanded to touch it, one at a time.
If the body remained unchanged, the suspect might be innocent.
But if the corpse suddenly began to bleed, the dead had spoken.
The murderer had touched the body.
When the Dead Accused the Living
The belief behind the ordeal took several forms.
In some traditions, blood appeared because the corpse itself was somehow identifying the person responsible for its death.
In others, the bleeding represented something darker.
The dead were demanding vengeance.
The custom is extremely old, with no single origin known. Similar practices were reportedly mentioned in Arabic documents dating as far back as 800 A.D., and references to the idea appeared in the Nibelungenlied, an ancient Germanic epic.
The belief survived for centuries.
It was even reflected in the works of William Shakespeare.
The Law of the Bier
Among German peoples, the practice became known as the Bahr-Recht, or Law of the Bier.
This wasn’t necessarily regarded as mere superstition.
The Ordeal of Touch became accepted as fact by people from different levels of society, including educated and influential individuals.
One notable believer was Dr. Walter Charleton, chief physician to King Charles I.
To believers, the phenomenon offered something extraordinarily appealing in an age when solving a murder could be almost impossible.
The victim could become the final witness.
The Ordeal in Old Ballads
The belief also found its way into folklore and traditional ballads.
One example appears in the old ballad Earl Richard and Young Huntin’. In the story, different women touch the dead man’s body.
One produces no reaction.
When another places her hand upon him, the corpse bleeds.
The implication would have been immediately recognizable to audiences familiar with the tradition.
The dead man had identified the guilty party.
Where Did the Ordeal of Touch Begin?
The precise origin of the custom is uncertain.
Historical writers proposed several explanations.
One theory connected the practice with ancient Jewish traditions surrounding the importance of blood.
Blood was regarded as possessing profound significance and was associated with life and the soul. From this, some writers attempted to trace the later European Ordeal of Touch back to older religious customs.
Whether that was genuinely the origin of the practice was another question.
But older writers found several traditions they believed supported the connection.
Asking Forgiveness From the Dead
The Book of Jewish Ceremonies by Pedahzur, published in 1738, described an unusual mourning custom.
According to the account, friends and relatives of the deceased placed a hand upon the corpse’s largest toe and asked forgiveness for any offenses they might have committed against that person during life.
If the offense had been particularly serious, or forgiveness was not granted, the corpse’s nose supposedly began to bleed.
A writer named Manasoch Ben Israel also mentioned the practice in a work dating from 1651.
Once again, blood became the means through which the dead communicated with the living.
The Blood of Abel
The symbolism was also connected with the biblical story of Cain and Abel.
According to the account cited in the article, the Babylonian Talmud stated that the ground refused to absorb Abel’s blood until Cain had been punished.
The idea was strikingly similar to the belief underlying the Ordeal of Touch.
Blood spilled through murder demanded justice.
Until justice arrived, the dead could not remain silent.
Ordeal of Touch Versus Ordeal of Water
There was an interesting contradiction among believers in supernatural ordeals.
Some people who firmly accepted the Ordeal of Touch considered the Ordeal of Water, later notoriously associated with witch trials, to be heathenish and ridiculous.
To modern readers, distinguishing between the credibility of the two practices might seem peculiar.
To those who believed in the Bier’s Test, however, the bleeding corpse apparently occupied an entirely different religious and cultural tradition.
Preparing the Corpse
As the ritual became established, even the way the corpse was presented could reflect the ordeal.
Bodies were sometimes wrapped in bright white linen.
There was a practical reason.
Any fresh blood would be immediately visible against the pale fabric.
The ritual therefore became almost theatrical.
The corpse waited upon the bier.
The suspects approached.
One after another, they touched the dead.
Everyone watched the white cloth.
And they waited for blood.
The Ordeal in Art
The strange custom also survived through art.
The famous nineteenth-century painter Daniel Maclise depicted the Ordeal of Touch, preserving the unsettling spectacle of the ritual for later generations.
By then, the belief belonged increasingly to history and folklore.
But for generations before that, it had been treated with remarkable seriousness.
When a Corpse Became a Witness
The Ordeal of Touch belonged to a world without fingerprints, DNA testing, modern pathology, or sophisticated forensic investigation.
When someone was murdered, discovering the killer could be extraordinarily difficult.
The Bier’s Test offered an answer rooted not in evidence as we understand it today, but in something older.
Justice itself was thought to disturb the dead.
A murdered body could not identify its killer with words.
Instead, according to the belief, it spoke through blood.
And if the corpse began bleeding when a particular person placed a hand upon it, the verdict seemed unmistakable.
The dead had accused the living.
About the Author
